Both Intel and AMD use different views to the processor, the architecture of the processor itself. In this case, nothing can be said to be superior or not. AMD
integrates the memory controller into its processors, so that the data
path between the processor with the chipset to be shorter. Intel
does not integrate the memory controller into the processor (although
now that view has changed with the presence of Core i7 / codename
Nehalem) and focus more on growing internal memory on the processor. Both Intel and AMD, have their respective advantages. For
AMD, the cultivation of the memory controller is often referred to as
HyperTransport into the processor makes data transfer rate is faster
(because it does not have to wait for the data from main memory), but it
makes the internal memory on the processor becomes small. For
Intel, the integration of the processor internal memory (obtained from
the cultivation of a large number of transistors) makes it powerful in
terms of multi-threading applications as it pertains to the primary
function of the internal memory of the processor itself (as a temporary
data storage to be processed by the processor), but less Digdaya in its price range. I as the authors acknowledge, with Intel over AMD technology level. Therefore,
